FAILDEX失樂園
中文

Nanosolar

The business, the turning points, and the decisions behind them.

Founded2002
Event year2013

01 / WHAT IT BUILT

What the company did

Nanosolar, Inc. was a San Jose, California-based developer of thin-film solar power technology, founded in 2002 by Martin Roscheisen and Brian Sager. It developed a low-cost printable solar-cell manufacturing process — printing copper-indium-gallium-selenide (CIGS) ink on foil — and began selling CIGS panels in December 2007, planning to sell at 99 cents per watt, far below the market. Valued at $2 billion in its heyday and backed by investors including Energy Capital Partners and Benchmark Capital, it raised more than $400 million in investment but ultimately produced less than 50 MW of capacity. It closed in 2013 (defunct).

02 / Nanosolar FAILURE REASONS

Failure reasons

Nanosolar was crushed by the collapse of silicon solar prices. Its cost advantage evaporated as crystalline-silicon panel prices declined significantly, leaving its CIGS panels uncompetitive. By February 2013 it had laid off 75% of its workforce, and in August 2013 it auctioned off its San Jose equipment after selling its German factory to a Swiss investor. Co-founder Martin Roscheisen wrote that Nanosolar 'ultimately failed commercially', blaming the slow development cycle, complex production problems and cheap Chinese solar production — and said he would not enter the industry again.

03 / EVENT HISTORY

Events in the structured record

  1. Company founded

    Nanosolar was founded.

  2. Operations ended

    Nanosolar ended operations.

04 / CONTEMPORARY REBUILD ASSESSMENT

Difficulty of rebuilding this project today

Material for this section is being gathered and checked. It will appear here once ready.

Rebuild difficultyPending assessmentNot completed
Scoring basisNot completed
ScalabilityPending assessmentNot completed
Scoring basisNot completed

Overall assessment: Not completed

05 / CAUSAL CHAIN

How the factors connect

  1. 01

    Nanosolar raised more than $400 million in investment but produced less than 50 MW of capacity; it was once valued at $2 billion. No audited loss figure with disclosed subject, period and basis was extracted — the $400M+ is capital raised, not loss.